Dec 12th 2013

Don’t Let Hardliners Undermine Iran Nuclear Negotiations – and Drag America into Another Mid-East War

by Robert Creamer

Robert Creamer is a long-time political organizer and strategist and author of the recent book: "Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win," available on amazon.com.
Tough talk is coming from some Members of Congress who oppose the new international agreement to limit the Iran nuclear program and want to plow ahead with additional sanctions, even though that vote could jeopardize the agreement and lead America into another Mid-East War.
 
The deal was negotiated between Iran and the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council – including the United States – plus Germany.
 
Under the agreement, Iran will freeze its nuclear development program and will neutralize its entire stockpile of uranium that has already been enriched at a level that is close to what is needed to make a nuclear weapon.  Iran will submit to international inspections to verify that it is living up to the terms of the agreement.  In return, the United States and other countries will reduce some economic sanctions on Iran, while leaving most economic sanctions in place, and agree not to place any new sanctions on Iran while the agreement is in force.
 
The agreement is for six months, during which time there will be negotiations to reach a long-term comprehensive solution that would ensure that Iran’s nuclear program will be exclusively peaceful.  If a permanent deal is not achieved during this period, sanctions could be reinstated and toughened.
 
When the polling firm Hart Research read this description of the deal to a random sample of American voters, 63% said they supported it, and only 24% were opposed.  Thirteen percent said they were undecided. (Poll conducted November 26 - December 1)
 
In addition the overwhelming number of national security and military experts support the accord.
 
Experts on this agreement – and the Obama Administration that helped negotiate it – point out that the agreement explicitly prohibits additional sanctions on Iran during the six months it is in effect.  That was the quid pro quo for Iran’s willingness to freeze their nuclear program while a long-term deal is negotiated.
 
Regardless, there are some in Congress who are intent on passing new sanctions right away, even if it would threaten the entire negotiation.
 
Those Members need to read further in the Hart poll.  Sixty-seven percent say they would agree more with a Member of Congress who wants to give the new agreement and further negotiations a chance to work before deciding on any additional economic sanctions.  Only 25% prefer that Congress pass new sanctions on Iran now, even if it puts the new agreement and further negotiations at risk.
 
The reason American voters feel so strongly, is that they categorically oppose allowing the United States to be dragged into another war in the Middle East. 
 
In fact, 68% of poll respondents think that it is a convincing argument that we must try to reach a negotiated resolution preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon because the principle alternative would be military action and another U.S. war in the Middle East.
 
There are only three alternatives when dealing with the Iranian nuclear program.  Either we must negotiate a diplomatic agreement that prevents them from having a nuclear bomb, but allows some form of civilian nuclear energy program; or we let them have a nuclear bomb; or America – and/or its allies -- takes military action that would draw us into another Mideast war. 
 
Given those alternatives, national security experts and ordinary people alike all agree that the best option is a negotiated solution.   While most voters might not trust the intentions of the Iranian leadership, they know that a path to a verifiable negotiated agreement is head-and-shoulders superior to another war.   They’ve seen that movie and it ended badly.
 
Many Members of Congress have seen that movie, too, and they also need to remember the ending. 
 
Do they really want to take a vote for more sanctions now that could jeopardize the current agreement and the prospects for a negotiated, peaceful settlement?  If the negotiation fails there will be plenty of time for new, tougher sanctions.  The only imperative to pass additional sanctions now is the desire to please hard liners who really oppose any deal and actually want to promote military action.
 
In fact, experts agree that a vote now for new sanctions – even if they don’t go into effect for six or eight months – would provide a basis for hardliners in Iran to tube the deal and lead a drive to a nuclear weapon.  Worse yet, such action could unravel the international support for sanctions that is necessary to make them effective. 
 
If Congress takes matters into its own hands, and violates both the letter and spirit of the agreement, in order to score political points with hard-liners in the United States, they will also be breaking an agreement negotiated with the international community.  That will give other nations the incentive to pull out of the sanctions regime that they are supposedly interested in strengthening.
 
But from the standpoint of Members of Congress, the worst thing that could happen is that down the road – six months or a year from now – if their vote causes negotiations to collapse, America might actually be drawn into another Mideast war – either because Iran’s hardliners actually develop a bomb, or because hardliners in Israel attack Iran. 
 
If that happens, the voters will blame: them.  Why would Members of Congress want to take that risk?  Why would they take the risk that their actions might cause the collapse of negotiations that could lead to a peaceful settlement and be held responsible for dragging the country into another war in the Middle East?
 
Before they take a vote that could undermine negotiations with Iran, Members of Congress should think back on how most of their current and former colleagues feel now about the vote they took to authorize the Iraq War.  There aren’t many who would say it was their proudest moment. 
 
Many of the same Neo-Cons and hard liners who are itching for a military attack on Iran stampeded Members of Congress into voting to launch the Iraq War – which is now universally recognized as one of the worst single foreign policy mistakes of the last 50 years.
 
Many have had to live with that vote their entire careers. For others, it ended their careers in politics altogether.  
 
There are scores of current and former Members of Congress who have wished many times that they could take that vote back.
 
Most voters don’t know all the ins and outs of nuclear policy, or policy toward Iran.  But one thing is for sure:  The voters will blame Members of Congress whose votes get America into another Mideast war.
 
Call your Member of Congress.  Tell them that before they vote, they need to remember back to that vote that launched America into the War in Iraq.
 
      
 

Browse articles by author

More Current Affairs

Mar 18th 2024
EXTRACT: "....the UK’s current economic woes – falling exports, slowing growth, low productivity, high taxes, and strained public finances – underscore the urgency of confronting Brexit’s catastrophic consequences."
Mar 18th 2024
EXTRACTS: Most significant of all, Russia’s Black Sea fleet has suffered significant losses over the past two years. As a result of these Ukrainian successes, the Kremlin decided to relocate the Black Sea fleet from Sevastopol to Novorossiysk on the Russian mainland. Compare that with the situation prior to the annexation of Crimea in 2014 when Russia had a secure lease on the naval base of Sevastopol until 2042." --- "Ukrainian efforts have clearly demonstrated, however, that the Kremlin’s, and Putin’s personal, commitment may not be enough to secure Russia’s hold forever. Kyiv’s western partners would do well to remember that among the spreading gloom over the trajectory of the war."
Mar 8th 2024
EXTRACT: "As the saying goes, 'It’s the economy, stupid.' Trump’s proposed economic-policy agenda is now the greatest threat to economies and markets around the world."
Mar 8th 2024
EXTRACT: "Russia, of course, brought all these problems on itself. It most certainly is not winning the war, either militarily or on the economic front. Ukraine is recovering from the initial shock, and if robust foreign assistance continues, it will have an upper hand in the war of attrition."
Mar 8th 2024
EXTRACT: "...... with good timing and good luck, enabled Trump to defeat [in 2016] political icon Hillary Clinton in a race that appeared tailor-made for her. But contrary to what Trump might claim, his victory was extremely narrow. In fact, he lost the popular vote by 2.8 million votes – a larger margin than any other US president in history. Since then, Trump has proved toxic at the ballot box. " -----"The old wisdom that 'demographics is destiny' – coined by the French philosopher Auguste Comte – may well be more relevant to the outcome than it has been to any previous presidential election. "----- "Between the 2016 and 2024 elections, some 20 million older voters will have died, and about 32 million younger Americans will have reached voting age. Many young voters disdain both parties, and Republicans are actively recruiting (mostly white men) on college campuses. But the issues that are dearest to Gen Z’s heart – such as reproductive rights, democracy, and the environment – will keep most of them voting Democratic."
Mar 8th 2024
EXTRACTS: "How can America’s fundamentalist Christians be so enthusiastic about so thoroughly un-Christian a politician?" ---- "If you see and think outside the hermeneutic code of Christian fundamentalism, you might be forgiven for viewing Trump as a ruthless, wholly self-interested man intent on maximizing power, wealth, and carnal pleasure. What your spiritual blindness prevents you from seeing is how the Holy Spirit uses him – channeling the 'secret power of lawlessness,' as the Book of 2 Thessalonians describes it – to restrain the advent of ultimate evil, or to produce something immeasurably greater: the eschaton (end of history), when the messiah comes again."
Mar 1st 2024
EXTRACT: "The lesson is that laws and regulatory structures are critical to state activities that produce local-level benefits. If citizens are to push for reforms and interventions that increase efficiency, promote inclusion, and enable entrepreneurship, innovation, and long-term growth, they need to recognize this. The kind of effective civil society Nilekani envisions thus requires civic engagement, empowerment, and education, including an understanding of the rights and responsibilities implied by citizenship."
Feb 9th 2024
EXTRACT: "Despite the widespread belief that the global economy is headed for a soft landing, recent trends offer little cause for optimism."
Feb 9th 2024
EXTRACT: " Consider, for example, the ongoing revolution in robotics and automation, which will soon lead to the development of robots with human-like features that can learn and multitask the way we do. Or consider what AI will do for biotech, medicine, and ultimately human health and lifespans. No less intriguing are the developments in quantum computing, which will eventually merge with AI to produce advanced cryptography and cybersecurity applications."
Feb 9th 2024
EXTRACTS: "The implication is clear. If Hamas is toppled, and there is no legitimate Palestinian political authority capable of filling the vacuum it leaves behind, Israel will probably find itself in a new kind of hell." ----- "As long as the PLO fails to co-opt Hamas into the political process, it will be impossible to establish a legitimate Palestinian government in post-conflict Gaza, let alone achieve the dream of Palestinian statehood. This is bad news for both Israelis and Palestinians. But it serves Netanyahu and his coalition of extremists just fine."
Jan 28th 2024
EXTRACTS: "According to estimates by the United Nations, China’s working-age population peaked in 2015 and will decline by nearly 220 million by 2049. Basic economics tells us that maintaining steady GDP growth with fewer workers requires extracting more value-added from each one, meaning that productivity growth is vital. But with China now drawing more support from low-productivity state-owned enterprises, and with the higher-productivity private sector remaining under intense regulatory pressure, the prospects for an acceleration of productivity growth appear dim."
Jan 28th 2024
EXTRACT: "When Chamberlain negotiated the notorious Munich agreement with Hitler in September 1938, The Times did not oppose the transfer of the Sudetenland to Germany without Czech consent. Instead, Britain’s most prestigious establishment broadsheet declared that: “The volume of applause for Mr Chamberlain, which continues to grow throughout the globe, registers a popular judgement that neither politicians nor historians are likely to reverse.” "
Jan 4th 2024
EXTRACTS: "Another Trump presidency, however, represents the greatest threat to global stability, because the fate of liberal democracy would be entrusted to a leader who attacks its fundamental principles." ------"While European countries have relied too heavily on US security guarantees, America has been the greatest beneficiary of the post-war political and economic order. By persuading much of the world to embrace the principles of liberal democracy (at least rhetorically), the US expanded its global influence and established itself as the world’s “shining city on a hill.” Given China and Russia’s growing assertiveness, it is not an exaggeration to say that the rules-based international order might not survive a second Trump term."
Dec 28th 2023
EXTRACT: "For the most vulnerable countries, we must create conditions that enable them to finance their climate-change mitigation" ........ "The results are already there: in two years, following the initiative we took in Paris in the spring of 2021, we have released over $100 billion in special drawing rights (SDRs, the International Monetary Fund’s reserve asset) for vulnerable countries.By activating this “dormant asset,” we are extending 20-year loans at near-zero interest rates to finance climate action and pandemic preparedness in the poorest countries. We have begun to change debt rules to suspend payments for such countries, should a climate shock occur. And we have changed the mandate of multilateral development banks, such as the World Bank, so that they take more risks and mobilize more private money."
Dec 27th 2023
EXTRACT: "....if AI causes truly catastrophic increases in inequality – say, if the top 1% were to receive all pretax income – there might be limits to what tax reforms could accomplish. Consider a country where the top 1% earns 20% of pretax income – roughly the current world average. If, owing to AI, this group eventually received all pretax income, it would need to be taxed at a rate of 80%, with the revenue redistributed as tax credits to the 99%, just to achieve today’s pretax income distribution; funding the government and achieving today’s post-tax income distribution would require an even higher rate. Given that such high rates could discourage work, we would likely have to settle for partial inequality insurance, analogous to having a deductible on a conventional insurance policy to reduce moral hazard."
Dec 21st 2023
EXTRACT: "Shocks are here to stay, and our task is not to predict the next one – although someone always does – but to sharpen our focus on resilience. Staying the course of politically mandated policies while minimizing the inevitable dislocations is easier said than done. But that is no excuse to fall for the myth of being victimized by the unprecedented."
Dec 21st 2023
EXTRACTS: "A new world is indeed emerging. It will be characterized not only by more interdependencies, but also by more insecurity, danger, and war. Stability in international relations will become a foreign concept from a bygone age – one that we did not fully appreciate until it was gone."
Dec 14th 2023
EXTRACT: "Yet one must never forget that Putin is first and foremost an intelligence officer whose dominant trait is suspicion."
Dec 2nd 2023
EXTRACTS: "In a recent commentary for the Financial Times, Martin Wolf trots out the specter of a 'public-debt disaster,' that recurrent staple of bond-market chatter. The essence of his argument is that since debt-to-GDP ratios are high, and eminent authorities are alarmed, 'fiscal crises' in the form of debt defaults or inflation “loom. And that means something must be done.' ----- "If, as Wolf fears, 'real interest rates might be permanently higher than they used to be,' the culprit is monetary policy, and the real risk is not rich-country public-debt defaults or inflation. It is recession, bankruptcies, and unemployment, along with inflation." ---- "Wolf surely knows that the proper remedy is for rich-country central banks to bring interest rates back down. Yet he doesn’t want to say it. He seems to be caught up, possibly against his better judgment, in bond vigilantes’ evergreen campaign against the remnants of the welfare state."
Nov 27th 2023
EXTRACT: "The first Russia, comprising those living in Russia’s two biggest cities, Moscow and Saint Petersburg, can pretend there is no war at all." ---- "Then there is the other Russia, the one you find in small towns and villages scattered across the country’s massive territory. Here, the Ukraine war is a source of patriotic pride,"