Feb 14th 2022

The History and Failure of the War on Drugs 

by Tasnova Malek, MD

 

Tasnova Malek, MD, graduated from Bangladesh Medical College and practiced as a primary care physician for six years in Bangladesh. After moving to the USA, she worked at Emory University Hospital in Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Hospital medicine research. During COVID-19, she worked as a crisis counselor in Florida Corona Virus Emergency Response Team. Currently, she is working in the National Suicidal Prevention Center and as a medical reviewer for Sunshine Behavioral Health. In addition, she has extensive research experience in medicine and psychiatry in the USA.

 

Drug use and addiction have a notable impact on a person’s life and can negatively impact a person’s family, career, and personal relationships. With treatment centers doing their best to help, a focused effort has been combating drug addiction for decades. One such effort was the War on Drugs, a United States government plan to reduce drug use among citizens through harsher legal enforcement. These enforcement measures included increased policing, harsher penalties for drug use, and longer prison sentences for dealers.

 

The History of the War on Drugs

Drug use in the United States has a long history, and the associated laws to combat it are equally long. The earliest drug laws in the United States go back to the late 1800s, and the federal government passed various laws and acts throughout the coming decades. As it is currently understood, the War on Drugs started under President Richard Nixon after passing the Controlled Substances Act in 1970. As part of his declaration of drugs being public enemy number one, Nixon also created the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) in 1973. The DEA is focused entirely on illegal drug use, trafficking, and sales. Currently, the agency has over $2 billion and employs 5,000 agents.

The 1980s saw the War on Drugs continue under President Reagan, and many of the associated laws already in use were further expanded and enhanced. This focus on drug offenses is reflected in government reports that show an increase in incarceration rates. In 1986, the Anti-Drug Abuse Act was passed. It included mandatory sentencing for specific types of drug-related crimes. The Anti-Drug Abuse Act is one of the most heavily criticized aspects of the war on drugs, with uneven sentencing for crack (viewed as a primarily “black drug”) versus cocaine (popular among white users) being a famous point of criticism. The sentencing guidelines had a 100 to 1 ratio where possession of five grams of crack would carry the same prison sentence as five hundred grams of cocaine.

Over time, the support for the War on Drugs has waned, with public support dropping. Many states, between 2009 and 2013, reduced drug penalties and sentencing. In 2010, the federal government passed the Fair Sentencing Act to correct the above-noted discrepancy between crack and cocaine sentencing. Further softening on the War on Drugs rhetoric could be seen when states across the country began legalizing marijuana use for recreational and medical purposes. California was the first state to legalize medical marijuana in 1996 and Colorado and Washington state first legalized recreational use in 2012.

 

The Effects

In the decades since its inception, there has been heavy criticism directed towards the War on Drugs. These complaints include the increased incarceration rates, the increase in the number of prisoners in jail due to nonviolent offenses, uneven sentencing guidelines often based on the drug type and race, and suggestions of a racist component in terms of who was targeted by law enforcement. Various studies show that instead of reducing crime, the strict sentencing guidelines created more criminals and undermined many of the communities most strictly targeted by law enforcement. Long sentences for non-violent offenses made it difficult for those released to find work and weakened their bonds with family and their broader community.

 

Did the War on Drugs Fail?

With many decades of hindsight, the general view is that the War on Drugs did not accomplish its stated goals of creating a safer society with reduced crime and addiction. What is notable is the broad scope of the condemnation, with the Office of Justice reporting it as a failed policy and this view being reflected by institutions and think tanks across the political spectrum. While data points and areas of focus may differ, the viewpoint that the War on Drugs is a policy failure sees a wide range of support.

 

Alternative Solutions

Taking the view that the War on Drugs has failed, the next consideration is finding a proper solution to drug addiction, trafficking, and sales. An area often noted when reviewing the over one trillion dollars spent on fighting drug use in the last 50 years is how the money was used. Most of these government funds went towards law enforcement, which left very little for drug treatment programs. This lack of focus on the underlying causes of drug use has had the side effect of creating a lucrative black market for illegal drug sales. Alternative solutions point toward changing the focus of drug enforcement to the treatment of addiction. A greater focus on treating addiction reduces drug use and relapses, which in turn reduces the market size for drug dealers. Another element under consideration is regulating drugs instead of making them illegal. A focus on regulation allows for more precise treatment of drug users in treating their addiction and also harms the illegal drug black market.

 

Sources

 

Sunshinebehavioralhealth.com - Drug Rehab in Huntington Beach, CA

 

History.com - The War on Drugs

Britannica.com - War on Drugs

Wikkipedia.org - Uniform State Narcotic Drug Act

Bjs.ojp.gov - Drug Law Violators, 1980 - 86

ACLU.org - Cracks in the System: 20 Years of the Unjust Federal Crack Cocaine Law

Pewtrusts.org - More Imprisonment Does Not Reduce State Drug Problems

Ojp.gov - Social Consequences of the War on Drugs: The Legacy of Failed Policy

Pewresearch.org - Feds may be rethinking the drug war, but states have been leading the way

CNBC.com - America has spent over a trillion dollars fighting the war on drugs. 50 years later, drug use in the U.S. is climbing again.

 

 

Browse articles by author

More Essays

Mar 17th 2023
EXTRACTS: "The intensifying concentration of wealth, and unjustifiable level of income inequality is proving disastrous in many ways. Here are just a few of them. First, less equal societies typically have more unstable economies, and this country is no exception." --- "Second, there is an incontrovertible link between economic inequality and violent crime. The fact is that rates of violence are higher in more unequal societies." --- "Third, the undeniable fact is that the greater the economic inequality that exists, the worse it is for general health outcomes. What is sometimes overlooked is that income inequality is bad for health outcomes across economic strata, not just for those in poverty. To be sure, poor health and poverty are closely linked; but the epidemiological research shows that high levels of economic inequality “negatively affect the health of even the affluent, mainly because… inequality reduces social cohesion, a dynamic that leads to more stress, fear, and insecurity for everyone.” People live longer in countries with lower levels of inequality, as the World Bank reports. In the United States, for example, “average life expectancy is four years shorter than in some of the most equitable countries.” "
Mar 10th 2023
EDITOR: "Quantum mechanics, the theory which rules the microworld of atoms and particles, certainly has the X factor. Unlike many other areas of physics, it is bizarre and counter-intuitive, which makes it dazzling and intriguing. When the 2022 Nobel prize in physics was awarded to Alain Aspect, John Clauser and Anton Zeilinger for research shedding light on quantum mechanics, it sparked excitement and discussion. But debates about quantum mechanics – be they on chat forums, in the media or in science fiction – can often get muddled thanks to a number of persistent myths and misconceptions. Here are four."
Mar 7th 2023
EXTRACT: "....the destructive logic of the false dualism of man and nature continues to threaten our civilization. The new Enlightenment would overcome this dualistic perspective, by bringing about a deep reconsideration of our moral duties to animals and future generations, and transforming how we inhabit the Earth. Instead of thinking of ourselves as separate from nature, we must recognize that we are embedded in it, and that even our most mundane actions have far-reaching consequences."
Feb 28th 2023
EXTRACT: " It has now been a year since Russia, my birthplace, invaded Ukraine. For 365 days, we have been waking up to news of Russian missile strikes, bombings, murders, torture, and rape. It has been 365 days of shame and confusion, of wanting to turn away but needing to know what is happening, of watching Russians become “ruscists,” “Orks,” or “putinoids.” For 365 days, the designation “Russian-American,” previously straightforward, has felt like a contradiction in terms. For those in my situation, some methods of adapting to the new circumstances have come easier than others. Russian books still crowd my bookcase, but I no longer have any wish to re-read them. Chekhov and Nabokov cannot be blamed for the aggression against Ukraine, but it nonetheless has stolen their magic and their capacity to teach. These authors were my friends, as were the old-country rituals like Russian Easter vigils and New Year’s screenings of the Soviet classic Irony of Fate. I feel the loss acutely, but perhaps it is for the better. It helps me concentrate on the present."
Feb 18th 2023
EXTRACTS: "Like the United States, France has gained strength through immigration, a fact often overlooked by opponents of open borders. Science, industry and the arts have clearly benefitted. And I found the local color in the population to be a rich source for artwork."
Feb 17th 2023
EXTRACT: "Insects are by far the most numerous of all animals on Earth. The estimated global total of new insect material that grows each year is an astonishing 1,500 million tonnes. Most of this is immediately consumed by an upward food chain of predators and parasites, so that the towering superstructure of all the Earth’s animal diversity is built on a foundation of insects and their arthropod relatives. ---- If insects decline, then other wild animals must inevitably decline too."
Feb 14th 2023
EXTRACT: "When Bob Dylan and the Beatles were creating a conceptual revolution in popular music, producing works that were highly personal, obscure, and often incomprehensible to listeners, Bacharach was the greatest composer who continued the experimental tradition of Irving Berlin, Cole Porter, Richard Rodgers, and the other giants of the Golden Age."
Feb 7th 2023
EXTRACT: "Many of Hopper’s most famous works – Nighthawks (1942), for example (not in the exhibition) – have become so ubiquitous that we are in danger of no longer being able to see them. The corrective for this over-exposure is to engage with the artist’s less familiar work; that is, to come to the artist through another portal – obliquely, if you will – and thereby trace a new path into the world that his oeuvre represents. Hopper observed, “I think I’m not very human, I didn’t want to paint people posturing and grimacing. What I wanted to do was to paint sunlight on the side of a house.” It is as telling a description as any of Hopper’s painterly fascination with New York City."
Feb 3rd 2023
EXTRACT: "The built environment we inhabit is just the residue of a much greater imaginative world that never saw the light of day, evoking what might have been or still could be..."
Jan 18th 2023
EXTRACT: "In 2018, former US president Bill Clinton coauthored a novel with James Patterson, the world’s bestselling author. The President is Missing is a typical “Patterson”: a page-turner of a thriller, easy to read, with short chapters and large font. Patterson is accustomed to collaborative writing ..... He is as much a producer as he is a writer, using a string of junior collaborators to run his factory of novels. Patterson outlines the plot, the coauthors write the story, Patterson offers feedback. While he doesn’t seem to do much writing himself, it is a system that has made Patterson a rich man."
Jan 14th 2023
EXTRACT: "With hindsight, 2022 will be seen as the year when artificial intelligence gained street credibility. The release of ChatGPT by the San Francisco-based research laboratory OpenAI garnered great attention and raised even greater questions.  In just its first week, ChatGPT attracted more than a million users and was used to write computer programs, compose music, play games, and take the bar exam. Students discovered that it could write serviceable essays worthy of a B grade – as did teachers, albeit more slowly and to their considerable dismay."
Jan 14th 2023
EXTRACT: "The thought of her, as always, gave me a jolt of hope, and a burst of energy. And a stab of sorrow."
Jan 14th 2023
EXTRACT: ".....if academic discourse and campus debate are shut down every time a person feels offended, how can universities possibly examine controversial topics? Without intellectual freedom – one of the great achievements of American civilization – they can’t."
Jan 5th 2023
EXTRACTS: "London's Tate Britain and Paris' Petit Palais have collaborated to produce a wonderful retrospective exhibition of the art of Walter Sickert (1860-1942).  The show is both beautiful and fascinating. ----- Virginia Woolf loved Sickert's art, and it is not difficult to see why, because his painting, like her writing, was always about intimate views of incidents, or casual portraits in which individual sitters momentarily revealed their personalities.  ------ Sickert's art never gained the status of that of Whistler or Degas, perhaps because it was too derivative of those masters.  But he was an important link between those great experimental painters and the art of Lucian Freud, Francis Bacon, Frank Auerbach, ...."
Dec 5th 2022
EXTRACT: "One of the great paradoxes of human endeavour is why so much time and effort is spent on creating things and indulging in behaviour with no obvious survival value – behaviour otherwise known as art. Attempting to shed light on this issue is problematic because first we must define precisely what art is. We can start by looking at how art, or the arts, were practised by early humans during the Upper Palaeolithic period, 40,000 to 12,000 years ago, and immediately thereafter."
Dec 3rd 2022
EXTRACTS: "As a portrait artist, I am an amateur at this compared to the technology gurus and psychologists who study facial recognition seriously. Their aplications range from law enforcement to immigration control to ethnic groupings to the search through a crowd to find someone we know. ---- In my amateur artistic way, I prefer to count on intuition to find facial clues to a subject’s personality before sitting down at the drawing board. I never use the latest software to grapple with this dizzying variety.
Dec 1st 2022
EXTRACT: "In the exhibition catalog Lisane Basquiat writes: 'What is important for everyone to understand… is that he was a son, and a brother, and a grandson, and a nephew, and a cousin, and a friend. He was all of that in addition to being a groundbreaking artist.' "
Nov 24th 2022
"The art of kintsugi is inextricably linked to the Japanese philosophy of wabi-sabi: a worldview centred on the acceptance of transience, imperfection and the beauty found in simplicity.....nothing stays the same forever." --- "The philosophy of kintsugi, as an approach to life, can help encourage us when we face failure. We can try to pick up the pieces, and if we manage to do that we can put them back together. The result might not seem beautiful straight away but as wabi-sabi teaches, as time passes, we may be able to appreciate the beauty of those imperfections."
Oct 25th 2022
EXTRACT: "The prime minister of India, Narendra Modi, was quick to congratulate Sunak, referring to him as “the ‘living bridge’ of UK Indians”. In the difficult waters of British and indeed international politics, all eyes will be watching to see how well the bridge stands."
Oct 5th 2022
EXTRACTS: "In the Guardian, Peter Bradshaw eulogized Jean-Luc Godard as 'a genius who tore up the rule book without troubling to read it.' This is a fundamental misunderstanding." ----- " As had been true for Picasso - and Eliot, Joyce, Dylan, and Lennon - it was Godard's mastery of the rules of his discipline that made his violation of those rules so exciting to young artists, and his work so influential.  But perhaps these innovators' mastery of the rules can only be seen by those who themselves understand the rules."